Kesantunan Berbahasa Perspektif Islam: Tinjauan Teoritis

Authors

  • Muhammad Hildan Azizi STID Al-Hadid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55372/hikmah.v1i01.2

Keywords:

Linguistik, Kesantunan, Islam, Kajian Teoritis

Abstract

Masih terdapat kritik atas ragam prinsip kesantunan berbahasa yang dikaji oleh ilmuwan Barat sehingga ilmuwan Islam mencoba menawarkan alternatif baru prinsip kesantunan berdasarkan Al-Qur'an. Namun ternyata kajian itu masih bersifat uraian saja, belum terdapat kejelasan hubungan-kedudukan antarprinsip kesantunan yang diproposisikan. Juga paradigma yang mendasari prinsip-prinsip itu masih belum terjelaskan. Sehingga standar santun/tidaknya suatu bahasa masih sulit didefinisikan dan diterapkan dalam dakwah atau komunikasi sehari-hari. Penelitian ini bertujuan menjelaskan paradigma yang mendasari teori kesantunan berbahasa perspektif Islam serta menjelaskan kedudukan dan hubungan antarprinsip kesantunan itu agar tidak tumpang tindih. Metode integrative literature review digunakan untuk mengkaji teori-teori kesantunan berbahasa yang telah terpublikasi dan diuji transferabilitas berdasarkan kasus berbeda. Kajian ini menyimpulkan qawlan sadīdā sebagai prinsip kesantunan utama yang berkedudukan sebagai “substansi” isi pesan. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa teori kesantunan perspektif islam menggunakan paradigma theological, berbeda dengan perspektif Barat yang menekankan paradigma social/conversational. Sedangkan prinsip lain seperti qawlan ma’rūfā, layyinā, maysūrā, karīmā, dan balīghā; merupakan prinsip kesantunan penunjang yang bersifat opsional karena berkedudukan sebagai "kemasan" pesan. Derajat kesantunan dalam prinsip penunjang dapat disesuaikan dengan paradigma yang telah berkembang, sehingga kelebihan pada kesantunan perspektif Barat dapat digunakan pada prinsip yang bersifat kemasan sejauh disesuaikan dengan kondisi pragmatik/sosiolinguistik.

 

Abstract: There is still criticism of the various politeness principles studied by western scientists so that Islamic scientists try to offer new alternatives to politeness principles based on the Qur'an. However, it turns out that the study is still only descriptive in nature, there is no clarity about the relationship between the proposed politeness principles. Also the paradigm underlying the principles is still not explained. So that the standard of politeness or not in a language is still difficult to define and apply in da'wah or daily communication. This study aims to explain the paradigm that underlies the theory of politeness in an Islamic perspective and explain the position and relationship between the politeness principles so that they do not overlap. The integrative literature review method is used to examine theories of language politeness that have been published and tested for transferability based on different cases. This study concludes that qawlan sadīdā is the main principle of politeness which has a position as the "substance" of the message content. This shows that the Islamic perspective of politeness theory uses a theological paradigm, in contrast to the western perspective which emphasizes the social/conversational paradigm. While other principles such as qawlan ma'rufā, layyinā, maysūrā, karīmā, and balighā; is a supporting politeness principle that is optional because it is positioned as a "packaging" of messages. The degree of politeness in supporting principles can be adapted to the paradigm that has developed, so that the advantages of politeness from a western perspective can be used in packaging principles as long as they are adapted to pragmatic/sociolinguistic conditions.

Keywords: Linguistics, Politeness, Language, Islam, Theoretical Review

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, Wan Azura Wan, and Ahmad Fazullah M.Z.A. “Conceptual Model Of Communication Politeness Based On Quranic Rhetoric And Pshycology.” Accessed February 2, 2023. http://localhost:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/14273.

Al-Khatib, Mahmoud A. “Politeness in the Holy Quran: A Sociolinguistic and Pragmatic Perspective.” Intercultural Pragmatics 9, no. 4 (January 27, 2012): 479–509. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2012-0027.

Ali, Ku Zaimah Che, and Mardzelah Makhsin. “Konseptualisasi Amalan Kesantunan Berbahasa Menurut Al-Qur’an.” Jurnal Masyarakat Islam Dan Kontemporari 20, no. 1 (2019): 65–81. https://journal.unisza.edu.my/jimk/index.php/jimk/article/view/315.

Aliyah, Sri. “Bukti Kebenaran Al-Quran.” Jurnal Ilmu Agama : Mengkaji Doktrin, Pemikiran, Dan Fenomena Agama 16, no. 02 (2016): 103–17. http://jurnal.radenfatah.ac.id/index.php/JIA/article/view/511.

Ariani, Anita. “Standarisasi Dan Dasar Pijakan Etika Komunikasi Dakwah.” Alhadharah: Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah 14, no. 28 (2015): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.18592/ALHADHARAH.V14I28.1233.

“Arti Kata - Santun.” Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa, Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia, 2016. https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/santun.

Azizi, Muhammad Hildan. “Kesantunan Berbahasa Dakwah Struktural Pada Debat Politik Para Nabi Dalam Al- Qur’an.” Dakwatuna: Jurnal Dakwah Dan Komunikasi Islam 09, no. 01 (2023): 41–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54471/dakwatuna.v9i1.

Brown, Penelope, and Steven C. Levinson. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.

Cronin, Matthew A., and Elizabeth George. “The Why and How of the Integrative Review.” Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/1094428120935507, July 6, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120935507.

Davies, Bethan. “Grice’s Cooperative Principle: Getting the Meaning Across.” Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 8 (2000): 1–26. https://www.latl.leeds.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/49/2019/05/Davies_2000.pdf.

Fahriansyah, Fahriansyah. “Filosofis Komunikasi Qaulan Syakila.” Alhadharah: Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah 17, no. 34 (2019): 16. https://doi.org/10.18592/alhadharah.v17i34.2378.

Fraser, Bruce. “Perspectives on Politeness.” Journal of Pragmatics 14, no. 2 (April 1990): 219–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90081-N.

Hasjim, Nafron. “Kesantunan Berbahasa Dalam Islam.” Prosiding Seminar Nasional Magister Pengkajian Bahasa UMS 2013, 2013, 325–53.

Herti, Yeti Dwi. “Nilai-Nilai Pendidikan Humanis Dalam Surat An-Nisa Ayat 63.” Jurnal Kependidikan 07, no. 02 (2019): 157–65. https://doi.org/10.24090/jk.v7i2.3020.

Husna Husain. “Pendekatan Dakwah Terhadap Ahli Keluarga Berdasarkan Kisah Nabi Ibrahim A.S.” Al-Abqari: Journal of Islamic Social Sciences and Humanities 16, no. Special Issues (2018): 105–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33102/abqari.vol16no1.9.

Indrawati, Indrawati. “Santun Berbahasa Dalam Dakwah.” Jurnal Dakwah Dan Kemasyarakatan 14, no. 1 (2015): 45–51. https://doi.org/10.19109/wardah.v14i1.246.

Jaafar, Nurul Ashiqin, and Fariza Md Sham. “Language Politeness and Etiquette on Social Media From the Islamic Perspective : An Observation” 27, no. 02 (2022): 108–15. http://al-qanatir.com/aq/article/view/527.

Lakoff, Robin. “What You Can Do with Words: Politeness, Pragmatics, and Performatives.” Proceedings of the Texas Conference on Performatives, Presuppositions and Implicatures, 1977, 79–105. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED140617.pdf#page=94.

Mailani, Okarisma, Irna Nuraeni, Sarah Agnia Syakila, and Jundi Lazuardi. “Bahasa Sebagai Alat Komunikasi Dalam Kehidupan Manusia.” Kampret Journal 1, no. 1 (January 30, 2022): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.35335/kampret.v1i1.8.

Mislikhah, St. “Kesantunan Berbahasa.” Ar-Raniry, International Journal of Islamic Studies 01, no. 02 (2014): 285–96. https://doi.org/10.20859/jar.v1i2.18.

Munandar, Arif, and Muslim Djuned. “ZIHAR DALAM TAFSIR FI ZHILAL AL-QUR’AN DAN TAFSIR AL-MISHBAH.” TAFSE: Journal of Qur’anic Studies 2, no. 1 (June 30, 2018): 17. https://doi.org/10.22373/tafse.v2i1.8072.

Murni, Sri Minda. Kesantunan Linguistik. 1st ed. Medan: Unimed Press, 2013. http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/id/eprint/1610.

Nurhartanto, Armin. “Nilai-Nilai Pendidikan Akhlak Dalam Al-Qur’an Surat Ali Imran Ayat 159-160.” Jurnal Studi Islam Profetika 16, no. 02 (December 17, 2015): 159–61. https://doi.org/10.23917/PROFETIKA.V16I2.1851.

Rusdi Room. “Konsep Kesantunan Berbahasa Dalam Islam.” Jurnal Adabiyah 13, no. 02 (2013): 223–34. http://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/adabiyah/article/view/384/pdf_29.

Shahrokhi, Mohsen, and Farinaz Shirani Bidabadi. “An Overview of Politeness Theories: Current Status, Future Orientations.” American Journal of Linguistics 2, no. 2 (2013): 17–27. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.linguistics.20130202.02.

Souza, Marcela Tavares de, Michelly Dias da Silva, and Rachel de Carvalho. “Integrative Review: What Is It? How to Do It?” Einstein (São Paulo) 8, no. 1 (March 2010): 102–6. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082010RW1134.

Sulkifli, and Muhtar. “Komunikasi Dalam Pandangan Al-Quran.” PAPPASANG 03, no. 01 (June 30, 2021): 66–81. https://doi.org/10.46870/jiat.v3i1.75.

Torraco, Richard J. “Writing Integrative Literature Reviews.” Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1177/1534484316671606 15, no. 4 (October 25, 2016): 404–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606.

Trismayanti, Lutvi. “Konsep Qawlan Layyinadalam Surat Taha Ayat 41-44 Menurut Tafsir Ibnu Kasir Dan Tafsir Al-Mishbah Serta Relevansinya Dengan Komunikasi Dalam Pendidikan Islam.” Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ponorogo. Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ponorogo, 2017. http://etheses.iainponorogo.ac.id/id/eprint/2302.

Wahidy, Achmad. “Cerdas Dan Cermat Berbahasa Cermin Pribadi Bangsa Bermartabat: Perilaku Santun Berbahasa.” Jurnal Dosen Universitas PGRI … 17 (April 7, 2018): 1–14. https://jurnal.univpgri-palembang.ac.id/index.php/prosiding/article/view/1571.

Wan Ahmad, W. A., and M. Z. A. Ahmad Fazullah. “Conceptual Model of Communication Politeness Based on Quranic Rhetoric and Pshycology.” In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Quran as Foundation of Civilization (SWAT 2021), 102–14. Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, 2021. https://oarep.usim.edu.my/jspui/handle/123456789/14273.

Watts, Richard J. “Linguistic Politeness Research: Quo Vadis?” In Politeness in Language, edited by Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich, 2nd ed., xi–xlvii. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co, 2005.

Yonsa, Yuliana Febri Yornai. “MENJALIN HUBUNGAN SOSIAL MELALUI KESANTUNAN BERBAHASA.” Sarasvati: Bahasa, Sastra Dan Pengajarannya 2, no. 1 (June 26, 2020): 72. https://doi.org/10.30742/sv.v2i1.862.

Yulianto, Hendra Bagus. “Nalar Kemanusiaan Dalam Da’wah Multikultural: Upaya Memformulasikan Pesan Dakwah Humanis.” Jurnal Darussalam: Jurnal Pendidikan, Komunikasi Dan Pemikiran Hukum Islam XII, no. 1 (September 22, 2020): 72–92. https://doi.org/10.30739/DARUSSALAM.V12I1.1183.

Published

2023-07-01

How to Cite

Azizi, M. H. (2023). Kesantunan Berbahasa Perspektif Islam: Tinjauan Teoritis. Bilhikmah, 1(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.55372/hikmah.v1i01.2

Issue

Section

Articles